An account citing officials familiar with a Pentagon investigation says a February 28, 2026, strike on an elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, followed outdated intelligence, a site misclassification, compressed targeting timelines and heavy reliance on AI-enabled systems. The full investigation has not been publicly released.

An account of a Pentagon investigation, citing officials familiar with its findings, says a February 28, 2026, strike on the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, followed a chain of failures.
According to the account, those failures included outdated intelligence, an incorrect classification of the site, compressed targeting timelines and heavy reliance on AI-enabled systems. The physical site had changed, but the military intelligence record had not been adequately updated, and that problem moved through the targeting process.
The account referred to the strike as a U.S. strike. It also described the incident as a case study in the risks of using artificial intelligence to accelerate military targeting.
The full investigation has not been publicly released, so some details remain based on accounts from officials involved in the inquiry.
An account citing officials familiar with a Pentagon investigation says a February 28, 2026, strike on an elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, followed outdated intelligence, a site misclassification, compressed targeting timelines and heavy reliance on AI-enabled systems. The full investigation has not been publicly released.

An account of a Pentagon investigation, citing officials familiar with its findings, says a February 28, 2026, strike on the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, followed a chain of failures.
According to the account, those failures included outdated intelligence, an incorrect classification of the site, compressed targeting timelines and heavy reliance on AI-enabled systems. The physical site had changed, but the military intelligence record had not been adequately updated, and that problem moved through the targeting process.
The account referred to the strike as a U.S. strike. It also described the incident as a case study in the risks of using artificial intelligence to accelerate military targeting.
The full investigation has not been publicly released, so some details remain based on accounts from officials involved in the inquiry.